Design Search Autocomplete System

Search autocomplete inspired by large search engines' typeahead: a sharded trie of precomputed top completions rebuilt from aggregated query logs, edge caching of popular prefixes, real-time trending, personalized re-ranking and blocklist filtering. A teaching design.

Functional requirements

  • Return top‑K ranked suggestions for each typed prefix.
  • Support typo tolerance and multi-language inputs.
  • Ingest query/click logs and content updates for freshness.
  • Rank by popularity, recency, and optional personalization.
  • Per-tenant and per-API key rate limits and quotas.
  • Filter sensitive/offensive suggestions by configurable policies.
  • A/B switch ranking strategies without downtime.
  • Admin tools to reindex, rollback, and inspect features/results.

Non-functional requirements

  • Latency: p99 < 100 ms for suggest; cache hits < 10 ms.
  • Availability: 99.95%+; no single AZ failure should cause downtime.
  • Freshness: trending updates visible within 1–5 minutes; full reindex without downtime.
  • Scalability: horizontally scale API/index/worker pools; handle 100k+ rps globally.
  • Consistency: eventual for ranking/log-derived signals; strong for admin content updates.
  • Security: TLS 1.2+; authenticated APIs; PII in features encrypted at rest.
  • Resilience: timeouts, circuit breakers, retries with backoff, DLQ for bad events.
  • Observability: traces/logs/metrics for p99, cache hit ratio, index lag, and queue depth.

How the design evolves

Stage 1: SQL LIKE on Every Keystroke

See why counting matches on each keystroke can't serve typeahead.

What was missing: Nothing yet.

Why that's risky: Every keystroke triggers a scan over billions of rows; suggestions must appear in tens of milliseconds to be useful.

What gets added: One server answering each prefix by scanning and counting matching queries in the log table.

Trade-offs: Always up to date, far too slow.

Stage 2: Precomputed Top Completions per Prefix

Answer every prefix with a single lookup.

What was missing: Suggestions were computed per request.

Why that's risky: Short prefixes like 'a' or 'ho' are requested enormously often, and every request still reaches our servers.

What gets added: A prefix index (a trie whose nodes hold their top 10 completions) sharded by prefix range, a suggest service reading it, query logs aggregated into a stats database, and an index builder that rebuilds the trie every few hours, drops blocked terms, and swaps it in atomically.

Trade-offs: Suggestions are hours old: new trends don't appear until the next rebuild.

Stage 3: Edge Caching of Popular Prefixes

Answer the most common prefixes before they reach our servers.

What was missing: Every keystroke reached the suggest servers.

Why that's risky: Breaking news searches don't appear until the next index build.

What gets added: An edge cache holding responses for popular prefixes for about a minute (plus client-side debouncing so pauses, not every keystroke, send requests).

Trade-offs: Cached suggestions can be a minute stale.

Stage 4: Trending Queries in Near Real Time

Surface what's rising right now without rebuilding the index.

What was missing: New trends waited hours for a rebuild.

Why that's risky: Everyone sees the same suggestions regardless of their own history or location.

What gets added: A trend detector reading the query log stream that spots fast-rising queries over sliding windows and publishes them per prefix, merged with the index's completions at serve time.

Trade-offs: Trending entries are checked against the blocklist before they're published, delaying them slightly.

Stage 5: Personalized Ranking

Order suggestions for the person typing.

What was missing: No personalization.

Why that's risky: Scrapers and manipulation attempts aren't limited, and quality isn't measured.

What gets added: A personal ranker that re-orders the top completions using the person's recent searches and location.

Trade-offs: Personalized responses can't be cached at the edge, so only the re-ranking step is per person.

Stage 6: Limits and Monitoring

Resist manipulation and watch quality and speed.

What was missing: No limits or quality monitoring.

Why that's risky: Remaining risk is content: new offensive terms need fast addition to the blocklist.

What gets added: Rate limits per client (manipulators try to push terms by repeating searches), and monitoring of per-keystroke latency, edge hit rate, index freshness and suggestion click-through.

Trade-offs: Limits can affect shared networks; they're tuned per client type.

Frequently asked questions

Trie vs inverted vs n‑gram for autocomplete — which should I choose?

Use a trie or n‑gram index specialized for prefix lookups. If you also need full‑text features, maintain both: an inverted index for search and a compact trie/n‑gram for suggest. Keep indexes in sync via an async pipeline.

How do you keep p99 under 100 ms at high QPS?

Put a hot result cache in front of the index, shard the suggest replicas behind a load balancer, and keep results small (limit K, compress). Use timeouts/circuit breakers and pre-warm caches on deploy. Track tail latency and cache hit ratio closely.

How do you rank suggestions and support personalization?

Combine popularity and recency signals from logs with optional user features (locale, history). Run a Ranking Service that merges index candidates with feature lookups; compute features offline and store in a features DB for low-latency reads.

How do you keep the index fresh without overwhelming the system?

Stream deltas from content changes and logs into a queue; batch and debounce updates in workers. Maintain a DLQ for bad events and rate-limit backfills. Expose tooling to pause/resume pipelines and rebuild specific shards/sectors.

How do you handle abuse and offensive suggestions?

Maintain a policy filter that runs post-ranking to remove banned terms and low-quality suggestions. Support tenant-specific blocklists and thresholds. Log rejections for review and retraining.

PRISM
System Design Interview
Round 1 of 4 · Architecture Design · 60:00 remaining
PRISM logo PRISM logo
Problems
AI Interview
Interview Challenges
Build & Stress Test NEW
System Architectures
Design & Fix NEW
Interactive Roadmap
System Design Guides Interview Prep Guide
Problems
Today's mission
Notifications
    Theme
    Pricing Community NEW Send feedback Report a problem NEW
    Sign in
    Theme
    Community NEW Send feedback Report a problem NEW
    All problems
    Phase
    Build & Stress Test
    Phase 01: Thinking in Systems
    Upcoming

    Components

    User
    CDN
    Load Balancer
    Server
    Cache
    Database
    Blob Storage
    Search Index
    Queue
    Worker
    Rate Limiter
    Service
    API Gateway
    Reverse Proxy
    WebSocket Server
    Third-party API

    Inspector

    Notes
    Use clear names so your design intent is easy to understand.
    Good
    Name by business meaning
    "Order API", "Restaurant Service"
    Avoid
    Generic names = zero signal
    "Server 1", "API", "Queue"
    A short description for each component makes feedback much better.
    100%
    Start by identifying:
    • Users & entry points
    • APIs & services
    • Databases & storage
    • Traffic flow & scale

    Round 1 of 4 Architecture Design

    Run a simulation to see results.

    Time Remaining
    60:00
    System Design Interview

    What are the core functional requirements?
    What are the key non-functional constraints?

    Questions

    Start Evaluation to unlock questions.

    EVALUATE MODE

    Test yourself like it's the real thing.

    A structured 4-module evaluation that mirrors how top companies assess system design candidates.

    Architecture Design
    Draw your system on the canvas. Define components, connections, and data flow.
    FR & NFR Requirements
    Answer functional and non-functional requirement questions about your design.
    MCQ Round
    Multiple choice questions testing your depth on the chosen system.
    Tradeoff Analysis
    Justify your design decisions and defend your architectural tradeoffs.
    AI Report Generated
    Choose a Problem
    No problem selected
    • 30 min
    • 45 min
    • 60 min
    Round 2 of 4
    MCQ Round
    Answer multiple-choice questions based on your design.

    Exit Interview?

    You're in the middle of an interview session. Leaving now will end your current attempt.

    Your progress will be saved.

    Open a saved design

    Select a design to load into the canvas.

    My Evaluations

    Your past evaluation sessions

    Here’s a simple request flow that follows the expected layer order.

    External User
    →
    Edge CDN → API Gateway → Load Balancer
    →
    Compute App Servers / Services
    →
    DataAccess Cache
    →
    Storage Database / Search Index
    →
    Async Queue → Worker

    Tip: keep arrows moving forward through layers (Edge → Compute → Storage). Avoid sending storage back to compute.

    Evaluation Instructions

    Read the rules carefully before starting. The test auto-submits on refresh.

    Before you start

    • Build your architecture on the canvas. The timer starts when you click Start Evaluation.
    • Don't forget to answer Functional Requirement and Non Functional Requirements.
    • When satisfied with your design, click Next to lock it and view the questions.
    • Please answer final step questions to complete the evaluation.

    Dos

    • Do read each question carefully before answering.
    • Do include required components to maximize component coverage.
    • Do save a copy of your design if you want to keep it before submission.

    Don'ts

    • Don't refresh or close the tab during an active evaluation — this will auto-submit your answers.
    • Don't switch app modes or open another tab while the evaluation is running.
    • Don't attempt to edit the design after clicking Next; the workspace will be locked.

    All the best!!

    Confirm

    Input

    Notice

    Evaluation Report
    Report a problem

    Evaluation Complete

    Generating Your Report

    Hang tight — our AI is evaluating your design…

    Did you know?

    Loading…

    Share feedback

    Tell us what worked well and what we can improve.

    Let's personalize this

    Answer a couple of quick questions so we can tailor your journey and missions.

    Your welcome gift: of Full PRISM Access

    Your Pro access starts as soon as you press Start my journey.

    SYSTEM BRIEF

    System Constraints

    What the system must do — every item is a user-facing behaviour your architecture must support.

      ↑ Engineering Constraints

      These are the failure modes you must design against — latency SLAs, durability targets, traffic ceilings.

        ⇆ Architecture Constraints

        Core Concepts to Master

        Your Journey
        PHASE – –
        0 / 0 0%
        0
        Mock Interview Checklist

        Pick a topic to start

        Explore concept overviews, real-system examples, key tradeoffs, and interview talking points for each roadmap section.

        Phase Mastered

        You've conquered this phase. These are the skills you now own:

          +500 XP

          Company Interview Paths

          Progress Summary